Overview

AGI tracked as milestone claims.

This tracker asks what needs to be true for AI to count as AGI, then breaks each milestone into lower-level conditions backed by sample evidence and confidence judgments.

Last updated Mar 17, 202615 top-level milestones75 sample evidence items

Tracker overview

One clean snapshot of the milestone progression.

The board summarizes high-level milestone status, evidence volume, and overall progress.

Status distribution

15 milestones

Met

2

In progress

11

Not met

2

Milestones tracked

15

Evidence items

75

Average progress

54%

Methodology

These public-facing capability pillars are plain-language summaries built on a deeper coverage map spanning reasoning, learning, truthfulness, self-monitoring, social competence, multimodal understanding, safety, and robustness. Each granular question is intended to be backable by benchmarks, controlled studies, audits, red-team exercises, longitudinal trials, or expert-blind review.

Milestone board

Implementation milestones

Each card represents a high-level AGI statement. Click to open the current rationale, sub-question status, and evidence-backed assessment.

Community

Suggestion queue

Open form

Separate factual accuracy from factual honesty more explicitly

The new evidence pillar covers both, but a future revision could make bluffing-versus-being-wrong a more visible distinction in the public wording.

reviewing

A. Chen | Mar 18, 2026

Add a stronger threshold for long-horizon drift resistance

Repeated-use stability may deserve its own more prominent card or a more demanding sub-question set under the reliability pillar.

queued

J. Morales | Mar 20, 2026

Expose the hidden capability coverage map more clearly

A lightweight legend showing which deeper dimensions each pillar covers could help expert users audit completeness without confusing general audiences.

merged

R. Singh | Mar 14, 2026